Synergistic and constraining effects of interaction between ecosystems and digital platforms in the innovation economy

K.V. Dyachkov, G.V. Dyachkov

---

Abstract. The article explores the patterns of interaction between digital platforms and platform ecosystems within the context of an emerging innovation economy. It is substantiated that the impact of platform models on innovative development is not unequivocally positive and is determined by the balance between synergistic and limiting effects. In contrast to existing studies that primarily focus on the advantages of the platform economy, this paper proposes a conceptual model of the dual impact of platform ecosystems, capturing both innovation generation processes and factors that constrain their diffusion.
Aim. The objective of this research is to examine the institutional aspects of platform ecosystem governance and determine its influence on the shaping and dynamics of innovation-driven demand.
Results. The research classifies the core synergistic effects generated by platform interaction into network, knowledge-driven, innovative, investment, collaborative, infrastructural, and regional effects. Concurrently, the research categorizes the constraining factors stemming from digital inequality, data aggregation, platform dependency, algorithmic asymmetry, digital market monopolization, and intensifying interregional disparities.
The author’s conceptual model of the platform economy’s aggregate impact has been designed, wherein the net influence of platforms hinges on the trade-off between driving and constraining forces. It is shown that the innovation dynamics of regions depend not so much on the level of digitalization as on the capacity of the regional socio-economic system to transform platform interactions into sustainable innovation processes. The study demonstrates that effective public policy must go beyond merely promoting digitalization; it must actively neutralize the constraining impacts of the platform economy by expanding digital infrastructure, enhancing regulatory frameworks, fostering market competition, and reducing regional digital disparities.
Conclusions. These findings contribute to the theoretical foundations of innovation economics and the platform economy, establishing a methodological groundwork for future studies on digital ecosystems and the design of governance tools for regional innovation dynamics.

Keywords: platform economy; digital platforms; platform ecosystems; innovative economy; synergistic effect; network effects; digital transformation; regional economy; innovative development; government regulation

For citation. Dyachkov K.V., Dyachkov G.V. Synergistic and constraining effects of interaction between ecosystems and digital platforms in the innovation economy. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of RAS. 2026. Vol. 28. No. 4. Pp. 130–144. DOI: 10.35330/1991-6639-2026-28-4-130-144

©  Dyachkov K.V., Dyachkov G.V., 2026

References

1. Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003. Vol. 1. No. 4. Pp. 990–1029. DOI: 10.1162/154247603322493212
2. Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics. 2006. Vol. 37. No. 3. Pp. 668–691. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
3. Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. Matchmakers: the new economics of multisided platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2016.
4. Parker G.G., Van Alstyne M.W., Choudary S.P. Platform revolution: how networked markets are transforming the economy – and how to make them work for you. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016.
5. Gawer A. Bridging Differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Research Policy. 2014. Vol. 43. No. 7. Pp. 1239–1249. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
6. Iansiti M., Levien R. The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
7. Moore J. F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review. 1993. Vol. 71. No. 3. Pp. 75–86.
8. Hein A., Schreieck M., Riasanow T. et al. Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets. 2020. Vol. 30. Pp. 87–98. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4
9. Yoo Y., Henfridsson O., Lyytinen K. The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research. 2010. Vol. 21. No. 4. Pp. 724–735. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1100.0322
10. OECD. An introduction to online platforms and their role in the digital transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. DOI: 10.1787/53e5f593-en
11. OECD. Rethinking antitrust tools for multi-sided platforms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
12. Tiwana A. Platform ecosystems: aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014.
13. Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal. 2018. Vol. 39. No. 8. Pp. 2255–2276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904
14. Cusumano M.A., Gawer A., Yoffie D.B. The business of platforms: strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. New York: Harper Business, 2019.
15. Nambisan S., Lyytinen K., Majchrzak A., Song M. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 41. No. 1. Pp. 223–238. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
16. Teece D. J. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning. 2018. Vol. 51. No. 1. Pp. 40–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
17. Shapiro C., Varian H. R. Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
18. Zhu F., Iansiti M. Why some platforms thrive and others don’t. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 97. No. 1. Pp. 118–125.
19. Makhosheva S.A., Kandrokova M.M., Rud N.Y. et al. The paradigm of sustainable development and innovation in the region. Espacios. 2018. Vol. 39. No. 47.
20. Gurtuev A., Derkach E., Makhosheva S., Ivanov Z. A bayesian approach to investment in innovation projects with the presence of fake innovators. Heliyon. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 11. Art. e05603.
21. Ivanova Z.Sh., Mahosheva S.A. Modeling of regional stability and regional development. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of RAS. 2014. No. 5(61). Pp. 118–125. EDN: STXYHN. (In Russian)
22. Makhosheva S.A., Ivanova Z.Sh. Intellectual economy and new architecture of regional social and economic systems. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of RAS. 2014. No. 5(73). Pp. 90–95. EDN: WYMXFD.(In Russian)
23. Galachieva S.V., Makhosheva S.A. Geoeconomic factors of sustainable development of the North Caucasus. Sustainable Development of Mountainous Territories. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 107–111. EDN: SILFMP. (In Russian)
24. Makhosheva S.A., Galachieva S.V., Khaitaev B.T. Expert system for multi-criteria assessment of performance indicators of the agro-industrial complex. Economic Sciences. 2012. No. 87. Pp. 119–123. EDN: NPHGYE. (In Russian)

Information about the authors

Konstantin V. Dyachkov, Postgraduate Student, Scientific and Educational Center, Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
2, Balkarov street, Nalchik, 360010, Russia;
konstantinco@yandex.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4654-7791
Georgy V. Dyachkov, Postgraduate Student, Scientific and Educational Center, Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
2, Balkarov street, Nalchik, 360010, Russia;
gosha.dyachkov@icloud.com

Funding

The study was performed without external funding.